<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBPP2 more flexible, but ECB leaves questions open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.coveredbondreport.com/2011/11/cbpp2-more-flexible-but-ecb-leaves-questions-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.coveredbondreport.com/2011/11/cbpp2-more-flexible-but-ecb-leaves-questions-open/</link>
	<description>News, analysis, data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Garre</title>
		<link>https://news.coveredbondreport.com/2011/11/cbpp2-more-flexible-but-ecb-leaves-questions-open/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Garre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.coveredbondreport.com/?p=4042#comment-45</guid>
		<description>If CBPP1 is anthying to go by, there should be a fair representation of each country&#039;s existing market share, i.e. periphery CBs wouldn&#039;t be the exclusive or even the main target of the programme, especially since most of the individual central banks don&#039;t seem to be too keen to buy periphery CBs anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If CBPP1 is anthying to go by, there should be a fair representation of each country&#8217;s existing market share, i.e. periphery CBs wouldn&#8217;t be the exclusive or even the main target of the programme, especially since most of the individual central banks don&#8217;t seem to be too keen to buy periphery CBs anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
